Industry Leaders Urge Immediate Action on PFAS Restriction Amidst Economic Fears

The letter, signed by prominent industry groups such as BDI, SPECTARIS, VDMA, and ZVEI, highlights the far-reaching impact of PFAS restrictions not only on the chemical industry but also on the production and availability of high-tech products throughout Europe. Industry leaders acknowledge the risks posed by certain PFAS compounds but argue that a more targeted, risk-based approach is essential for safeguarding Germany’s and Europe’s competitive edge.

Economic Uncertainty and Industry Disruptions

The ongoing PFAS restriction proposal has already led to significant planning uncertainties, halting investments, product discontinuations, and supply chain disruptions. The signatories fear that entire sectors could be lost if the regulatory approach does not shift towards assessing risks on a case-by-case basis.

According to the letter, the restriction process, as it stands, fails to differentiate between high-risk and low-risk PFAS applications. For example, the inclusion of fluoropolymers—used extensively in high-tech industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, and medical technology—has drawn particular concern. These polymers, which are essential to numerous technological advancements, are not toxic or bio accumulative, and their outright ban could severely hinder progress in critical sectors, including climate protection and technological sovereignty.

Calls for a Risk-Based Approach

The industrial associations propose a three-point action plan, urging the government to:

1. Hold a PFAS summit: Establish a continuous dialogue on chemical regulation with manufacturers, particularly those involved in high-tech applications. This would include sectors such as aerospace, defence, and medical technology.
2. Withdraw and revise the current restriction dossier: The letter calls for the temporary withdrawal and re-submission of the restriction proposal, aligning with a risk-based approach that prioritises regulating truly hazardous PFAS compounds.
3. Exclude fluoropolymers from restrictions: Fluoropolymers, which pose minimal risk during their usage phase, should be excluded from the restriction list. Targeted regulatory measures should instead focus on emissions and waste management during their production and disposal phases.

Strategic Impact on Germany’s Technological Leadership

The letter emphasises the strategic implications of the PFAS restrictions for Germany’s technological leadership in areas like semiconductor manufacturing, digitalisation, and the green transition. A blanket ban on PFAS compounds, without consideration of their specific risks, threatens to undermine decades of progress in these fields, potentially driving production out of Europe.

The industrial associations also voiced concerns over the lengthy decision-making process, which has already affected supply chains and halted investments. They argue that delays in regulatory clarity exacerbate the risk of losing key technological capabilities to non-European competitors.

Overview

Germany, as a co-initiator of the PFAS restriction proposal, holds a pivotal role in shaping its outcome. The industrial associations are calling on the government to act swiftly, urging a balanced approach that prioritises risk-based regulation while safeguarding the country’s economic and technological interests. Failure to address these concerns, they warn, could result in irreversible damage to Germany's high-tech industries and its global competitiveness.